Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on September 1, 2007
Rheumatology 2007 46(10):1627-1628; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem210
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Time to abandon the rheumatoid factor? Is it not time to rename it?
Department of Rheumatology, Portsmouth Hospitals Trust, Southwick Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK
Correspondence to: Ragai Shaban, Department of Rheumatology, Portsmouth Hospitals Trust, Southwick Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK. E-mail: Ragai.Shaban@porthosp.nhs.uk
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
SIR, We read Professor Symmons editorial [1] with interest. We agree with her conclusions and recommendations and would suggest another angle to the debate regarding the rheumatoid factor (RF).
Pike et al. [2]