Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on November 15, 2007
Rheumatology 2007 46(12):1835-1841; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem290
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/12/1835    most recent
kem290v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juul-Kristensen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Remvig, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juul-Kristensen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Remvig, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Benign Joint Hypermobility Syndrome
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Inter-examiner reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome

B. Juul-Kristensen1, H. Røgind2, D. V. Jensen3 and L. Remvig1

1Department of Medical Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital, Copenhagen, 2Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital and 3Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Nordsjælland, Hørsholm, Denmark.

Correspondence to: B. Juul-Kristensen, Department of Medical Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Dk-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. E-mail: birgit.juul.kristensen{at}rh.regionh.dk; bjkprivat{at}mail.dk


  Abstract

Objective. To test the reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) and benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS).

Methods. A standardized protocol for clinical reproducibility studies was followed using a three-phase study (with a training, an overall agreement and a test phase). An overall agreement of at least 0.80 was required to proceed to the test phase. Phases 1, 2 and 3 used 14 patients (with varying degrees of hypermobility), 20 patients (50% cases) and 40 patients (50% cases), respectively. The inclusion criterion for cases was hypermobility (patients with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome or BJHS) and for controls, non-hypermobility (patients with shoulder and/or back pain); patients were selected from patients’ files (phases 1 and 2) or included consecutively from our outpatient clinic (phase 3).

Results. The overall agreement in phase 2 was 0.95 for GJH and 0.90 for BJHS. Reproducibility for diagnosing GJH and BJHS in phase 3 showed kappa values of 0.74 and 0.84, respectively. Kappa in the Beighton tests for diagnosing GJH (currently or historically) was generally above 0.80, except for the fifth fingers and elbows (≥0.60). In the Brighton tests for diagnosing BJHS, kappa was above 0.73, except for the skin signs (0.63). Lowest kappa was found in the Rotès-Quérol tests, where it was ≥0.57, except for the right shoulder (0.31).

Conclusion. We found a good-to-excellent reproducibility of tests and criteria for GJH and BJHS. Future research on the validity of the tests and criteria for joint hypermobility is urgently needed.

KEY WORDS: Hypermobility, Beighton tests, Brighton criteria, Rotès-Quérol tests, Standardized protocol

Submitted 15 April 2007; revised version accepted 19 September 2007.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.