Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on August 5, 2006
Rheumatology 2007 46(2):335-341; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel266
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parotid gland biopsy compared with labial biopsy in the diagnosis of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and 2Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence to: C. G. M. Kallenberg, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO-Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. E-mail: c.g.m.kallenberg{at}int.umcg.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
Objective. To assess the value of the parotid biopsy as a diagnostic tool for primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), and to compare the parotid biopsy and the labial biopsy with regard to diagnostic value and biopsy-related morbidity.
Methods. In 15 consecutive patients with pSS and 20 controls, the parotid biopsy was assessed as a diagnostic tool based on the presence of lymphocytic foci, benign lymphoepithelial lesions and lymphoid follicles. These new histological criteria were compared with established diagnostic criteria for the labial biopsy in 35 consecutive patients suspected for pSS who underwent simultaneous biopsies from both sites. In addition, both biopsies were compared for morbidity.
Results. The first analysis revealed a focus score of
1 or lymphocytic infiltrates (not fulfilling the criterion of a focus score of 1) combined with benign lymphoepithelial lesions as diagnostic criteria for pSS. When comparing the parotid biopsy with the labial biopsy sensitivity and specificity were comparable (sensitivity 78%, specificity 86%). Level of pain was comparable and no loss of motor function was observed. No permanent sensory loss was observed after parotid biopsy, while labial biopsy led to permanent sensory loss in 6% of the patients. Malignant lymphoma was detected in one parotid biopsy by chance, without involvement of the labial salivary gland.
Conclusion. A parotid biopsy has a diagnostic potential comparable with that of a labial biopsy in the diagnosis of pSS, and may be associated with less morbidity.
KEY WORDS: Sjögren's syndrome, Parotid biopsy, Labial biopsy, Diagnosis
Submitted 8 May 2006;
revised version accepted 27 June 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. D. MILIC, R. R. PETROVIC, I. V. BORICIC, J. MARINKOVIC-ERIC, G. L. RADUNOVIC, P. D. JEREMIC, N. N. PEJNOVIC, and N. S. DAMJANOV Diagnostic Value of Salivary Gland Ultrasonographic Scoring System in Primary Sjogren's Syndrome: A Comparison with Scintigraphy and Biopsy J Rheumatol, July 1, 2009; 36(7): 1495 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pijpe, F. K. L. Spijkervet, J. E. van der Wal, C. G. M. Kallenberg, and A. Vissink Comment on: parotid gland biopsy compared with labial biopsy in the diagnosis of patients with primary Sjogren's Syndrome: reply Rheumatology, October 1, 2007; 46(10): 1625 - 1626. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Caporali, E. Bonacci, O. Epis, P. Morbini, and C. Montecucco Comment on: parotid gland biopsy compared with labial biopsy in the diagnosis of patients with primary Sjogren's Syndrome Rheumatology, October 1, 2007; 46(10): 1625 - 1625. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

