Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on April 19, 2007
Rheumatology 2007 46(6):904-906; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/6/904    most recent
kem060v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hale, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kitas, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hale, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kitas, G. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Right arrow Education
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


EDITORIALS

The Common-Sense Model of self-regulation of health and illness: how can we use it to understand and respond to our patients’ needs?

E. D. Hale1, G. J. Treharne2,1 and G. D. Kitas1,3,2

1Department of Rheumatology, Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Trust, UK, 2School of Psychology, University of Birmingham and 3Research Institute in Healthcare Science, University of Wolverhampton

Correspondence to: E. D. Hale, Department of Rheumatology Ward A1, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK. E-mail: Liz-Hale@toucansurf.com

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

As Hill et al. point out in their powerful paper [1], there is often a difference between objective clinical and radiographic evidence of musculoskeletal disease activity or severity and the experience of pain, other symptoms and functional ability reported by the patient. For the patient, the greatest impact of the disease lies in the effect it has on their ability to continue with a ‘normal’ daily life and this will necessarily be their focus of interest. It is, however, increasingly important for us as researchers and healthcare professionals to understand how the perceptions, experience and impact of having a musculoskeletal condition might influence a patient's interpretation and response to it, so that we, in turn, can respond more appropriately.

The model used by Hill et al. in their paper [1] to investigate these issues is varyingly known as the Illness Perceptions Model, the Illness . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?