Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on January 31, 2008
Rheumatology 2008 47(3):350-354; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem370
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/3/350    most recent
kem370v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karie, S.
Right arrow Articles by Deray, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karie, S.
Right arrow Articles by Deray, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Kidney disease in RA patients: prevalence and implication on RA-related drugs management: the MATRIX study

S. Karie1, F. Gandjbakhch2, N. Janus1, V. Launay-Vacher1, S. Rozenberg2, C. U. Mai Ba1, P. Bourgeois2 and G. Deray1

1Department of Nephrology and 2Department of Rheumatology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.

Correspondence to: S. Karie, Department of Nephrology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47–83, boulevard de l’hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. E-mail: svetlana.karie{at}psl.aphp.fr


   Abstract

Objectives. The prevalence of kidney disease (KD) indicators together with the profile of RA drugs prescribed in RA patients was investigated in the MATRIX study (MeThotreXate And Renal Insufficiency).

Methods. Renal function (RF) was assessed using Cockcroft–Gault (CG) and abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (aMDRD) study formulae.

Results. Serum creatinine (SCr) was normal in 81.4% of the 129 patients included. According to the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) classification, the distribution by stage of KD was, using the aMDRD and CG formulae, as follows: stage 1: 11.3% and 11.4%; stage 2: 20.0% and 20.3%; stage 3: 15.0% and 24.1%; stage 4: 0% and 1.3%; stage 5: 0%. Proteinuria, haematuria and leucocyturia were observed in 16%, 17% and 20% of the patients, respectively. Using the aMDRD and CG formulae, 36% and 38% of the prescriptions made in patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min required a dosage adjustment. Among the patients with GFR <60 ml/min, 83–90% received at least one drug that required a dosage adjustment and 67–70% received at least one drug that was potentially nephrotoxic, according to aMDRD or CG formulae, respectively. Five (50%) and 8 (47%) patients did not have appropriate MTX dosage adjustment according to their stage of KD with aMDRD or CG formulae, respectively.

Conclusion. Systematic estimation of RF with CG or aMDRD formulae and urine dipstick are necessary in RA patients. In patients with KD at high risk for drug toxicity, dosage should be adapted to RF.

KEY WORDS: Renal function, Drugs, Dosage adjustment

Submitted 1 October 2007; revised version accepted 11 December 2007.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Bateman, R. Penfold, and S. P. Rigby
Comment on: Kidney disease in RA patients: prevalence and implication on RA-related drugs management: the MATRIX study
Rheumatology, August 1, 2008; 47(8): 1259 - 1259.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.