Skip Navigation

Rheumatology 2008 47(4):535-541; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vera-Llonch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oster, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vera-Llonch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oster, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Cost–effectiveness of abatacept in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate

M. Vera-Llonch1, E. Massarotti2, F. Wolfe3, N. Shadick4, R. Westhovens5, O. Sofrygin1, R. Maclean6, Y. Yuan6 and G. Oster1

1Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Brookline, 2Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA, 3National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, 4Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, 5University Hospital, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and 6Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Correspondence to: G. Oster, Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, MA 02445, USA. E-mail: goster{at}pai2.com


   Abstract

Objective. To assess cost–effectiveness of abatacept in patients with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to MTX.

Methods. We developed a simulation model to depict progression of disability [in terms of the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI)] in women aged 55–64 yrs with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to MTX. At model entry, patients were assumed to receive either only MTX or MTX plus abatacept. Patients were then tracked from model entry until death. Future health-state utilities and medical-care costs (except study therapy) were estimated based on predicted values of the HAQ-DI. The model was estimated using data from a Phase III clinical trial of abatacept plus various secondary sources. Cost–effectiveness was expressed in terms of incremental cost (2006 US$) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained over alternatively 10 yrs and a lifetime. Costs and health effects were both discounted at 3% annually.

Results. Over 10 yrs, abatacept would yield 1.2 additional QALYs (undiscounted) per patient (4.6 vs 3.4 for MTX) at an incremental (discounted) cost of $51 426 ($103 601 vs $52 175, respectively); over a lifetime, corresponding figures were 2.0 QALYS (6.8 vs 4.8) and $67 757 ($147 853 vs $80 096). Cost–effectiveness was [mean (95% CI)] $47 910 ($44 641, $52 136) per QALY gained over 10 yrs and $43 041 ($39 070, $46 725) per QALY gained over a lifetime. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion. Abatacept is cost-effective by current standards of medical practice in patients with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to MTX.

KEY WORDS: Abatacept, Methotrexate, Rheumatoid arthritis, Outcomes, Cost–effectiveness

Submitted 3 May 2007; revised version accepted 4 January 2008.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.