Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 19, 2008
Rheumatology 2008 47(8):1244-1249; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken222
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/8/1244    most recent
ken222v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salaffi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Grassi, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salaffi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Grassi, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sjogren's Syndrome
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ultrasonography of salivary glands in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a comparison with contrast sialography and scintigraphy

F. Salaffi1, M. Carotti2, A. Iagnocco3, F. Luccioli4, R. Ramonda5, E. Sabatini3, M. De Nicola6, M. Maggi6, R. Priori3, G. Valesini3, R. Gerli4, L. Punzi5, G. M. Giuseppetti2, U. Salvolini6 and W. Grassi1

1Department of Rheumatology, 2Department of Radiology, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, 3Rheumatology Unit Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, 4Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, 5Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padova, Padova and 6Department of Neuroradiology, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy.

Correspondence to: F. Salaffi, Cattedra di Reumatologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Ospedale A. Murri, Via dei Colli, 52, 60035 - Jesi (Ancona), Italy. E-mail: fsalaff{at}tin.it


   Abstract

Objective. To compare ultrasonography (US) of salivary glands with contrast sialography and scintigraphy, in order to evaluate the diagnostic value of this method in primary SS (pSS).

Methods. The diagnostic value of parotid gland US was studied in 77 patients with pSS (male/female ratio 3/74; mean age 54 yrs) and in 79 with sicca symptoms but without SS. The two groups were matched for sex and age. Imaging findings of US were graded using an ultrasonographic score ranging from 0 to 16, which was obtained by the sum of the scores for each parotid and submandibular gland. The sialographic and scintigraphic patterns were classified in four different stages. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was employed to evaluate the screening method's performance.

Results. Of the 77 patients with pSS, 66 had abnormal US findings. Mean US score in pSS patients was 9.0 (range from 3 to 16). Subjects without confirmed pSS had the mean US score 3.9 (range from 0 to 9) (P < 0.0001). Results of sialography showed that 59 pSS patients had abnormal findings at Stage 1 (n = 4), Stage 2 (n = 8), Stage 3 (n = 33) or Stage 4 (n = 14), and 58 patients had abnormal scintigraphic findings at Stage 1 (n = 11), Stage 2 (n = 18), Stage 3 (n = 25) or Stage 4 (n = 4). Through ROC curves US arose as the best performer (AUC = 0.863 ± 0.030), followed by sialography (AUC = 0.804 ± 0.035) and by salivary gland scintigraphy (AUC = 0.783 ± 0.037). The difference between AUC-ROC curve of salivary gland US and scintigraphy was significant (P = 0.034). Setting the cut-off score >6 US resulted in the best ratio of sensitivity (75.3%) to specificity (83.5%), with a likelihood ratio of 4.58. If a threshold >8.0 was applied the test gained specificity, at the cost of a serious loss of sensitivity (sensitivity 54.5%, specificity 97.5%, likelihood ratio 21.5).

Conclusions. Salivary gland US is a useful method in visualizing glandular structural changes in patients suspected of having pSS and it may represent a good option as a first-line imaging tool in the diagnostics of the disease.

KEY WORDS: Sjögren's syndrome, Salivary glands, Ultrasonography, Sialography, Salivary gland scintigraphy, Diagnosis

Submitted 18 December 2007; revised version accepted 12 May 2008.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
V. D. MILIC, R. R. PETROVIC, I. V. BORICIC, J. MARINKOVIC-ERIC, G. L. RADUNOVIC, P. D. JEREMIC, N. N. PEJNOVIC, and N. S. DAMJANOV
Diagnostic Value of Salivary Gland Ultrasonographic Scoring System in Primary Sjogren's Syndrome: A Comparison with Scintigraphy and Biopsy
J Rheumatol, July 1, 2009; 36(7): 1495 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.