Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on August 3, 2009
Rheumatology 2009 48(10):1332-1333; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep214
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Comment on: Analgesic effects of treatments for non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials
1Department of Rheumatology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
Correspondence to: Brian J. Sweetman, Department of Rheumatology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK. E-mail: brian.sweetman@swansea-tr.wales.nhs.uk
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
SIR, Much well-intentioned back pain research seems to have been in vain. The meta-analysis of treatment of non-specific low back pain by Machado et al. [1] serves as an excellent review.
Most importantly, only 76 treatment studies were found suitable
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. C. Machado Comment on: Analgesic effects of treatments for non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials: reply Rheumatology, October 1, 2009; 48(10): 1333 - 1333. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
