Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on February 28, 2003

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keg215
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2003; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/6/769    most recent
keg215v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chinappen, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chinappen, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology 2003; all rights reserved

Original Papers

Acceptability and compliance with hip protectors in community-dwelling women at high risk of hip fracture

S. Patel 1*, L. Ogunremi 2, U. Chinappen 2

1 Osteoporosis Unit, Department of Rheumatology, St George's Hospital, London, SW17 0QT; Department of Rheumatology, St Helier Hospital, Carshalton, Surrey SM5 1AA, UK
2 Osteoporosis Unit, Department of Rheumatology, St George's Hospital, London, SW17 0QT

* Corresponding author. E-mail: spatel{at}epsom-sthelier.nhs.uk.

Received 2 July 2002 ; accepted 28 November 2002

Abstract

Objectives. To determine acceptability and compliance with hip protectors in women at high risk of hip fracture who are living independently in the community.

Methods. Women aged 65 yr and over referred for open access bone densitometry who had femoral neck osteoporosis and a high risk of falling were asked to wear hip protectors.

Results. Eighty five women fulfilled the inclusion criteria of whom 32 (38%) found the hip protectors acceptable and agreed to participate. Reasons given by the remaining 53 (62%) for not finding the hip protectors acceptable included discomfort on wearing, dislike of their personal appearance with the hip protectors on, and disagreement about their fracture risk. Participants were more likely to have a family history of osteoporosis (47 vs 26%, respectively) and hip fracture (16 vs 8%) compared with non-participants. At 12 months only about half of the subjects were wearing hip protectors daily.

Conclusions. Our findings suggest that only a minority of community-dwelling women at high risk of hip fracture will wear hip protectors to reduce fracture risk. Their use should be restricted to highly motivated women who should be carefully identified.

Key words: Hip protectors, Hip fracture, Community care, Osteoporosis, Compliance.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
N. Hayes, J. C. T. Close, S. Witchard, R. Awan-Bux, L. Anthony, S. Cawley, and S. H. D. Jackson
What predicts compliance rates with hip protectors in older hospital in-patients?
Age Ageing, March 1, 2008; 37(2): 225 - 228.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
C. Cryer, A. Knox, and E. Stevenson
Factors associated with the initial acceptance of hip protectors amongst older people in residential care
Age Ageing, January 1, 2006; 35(1): 72 - 75.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
H. Kaz Kaz, D. Johnson, S. Kerry, U. Chinappen, K. Tweed, and S. Patel
Fall-related risk factors and osteoporosis in women with rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, October 1, 2004; 43(10): 1267 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.