Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on February 28, 2003

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keg230
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2003; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/7/846    most recent
keg230v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zou, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sieper, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zou, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sieper, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology 2003; all rights reserved

Original Papers

Predominant cellular immune response to the cartilage autoantigenic G1 aggrecan in ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis

J. Zou 1, Y. Zhang 2, A. Thiel 3, M. Rudwaleit 1, S.-L. Shi 2, A. Radbruch 3, R. Poole 2, J. Braun 4, J. Sieper 5*

1 Department of Rheumatology, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Free University, Berlin, Germany
2 Joint Diseases Laboratory, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
3 German Rheumatology Research Center, Berlin, Germany
4 Department of Rheumatology, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Free University, Berlin; Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
5 Department of Rheumatology, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Free University, Berlin; German Rheumatology Research Center, Berlin, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: hjsieper{at}zedat.fu-berlin.de.

Received 27 June 2002 ; accepted 3 December 2002

Abstract

Objectives. Based on their HLA association, both ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seem to be T-cell-driven diseases in which the autoantigens remain to be defined. One possible autoantigen is the G1 domain of aggrecan, the major cartilage proteoglycan. In BALB/c mice immunized with this protein, spondylitis and erosive polyarthritis have been reported. Immune reactivity to the G1 has been described in patients with RA and AS in an earlier study. Using novel and more sensitive techniques and relevant controls we sought to define the role of G1 as an autoantigen more precisely and to extend the specific analyses to the peptide level.

Methods. Peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells (MNC) from 47 AS patients, 22 RA patients and 20 healthy normal controls were exposed in vitro for 6 h to the cartilage-derived autoantigens G1, human cartilage (HC) gp-39 and collagen II. Synovial fluid (SF) MNC from seven AS and four RA patients were similarly analysed. Furthermore, PB MNC of 15 AS and 10 RA patients were examined with overlapping 18-mer peptides covering the whole G1 protein to identify the immunodominant epitopes. T cells were stained by monoclonal antibodies directed against the surface markers CD4, CD69 and against the intracellular cytokines interferon-{gamma} (IFN{gamma}), tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF{alpha}), interleukin 4 (IL-4) and IL-10. The percentage of reactive T cells was quantified by flow cytometry.

Results. After antigen-specific stimulation with the G1 protein, the CD4+ T cells of 30 AS patients (61.7%) and of 12 RA patients (54.5%) secreted significant amounts of IFN{gamma} and TNF{alpha}, while, in contrast, only 10% of the normal controls showed a response (P < 0.05). The synovial CD4+ T cells of five AS (71.5%) and of all four RA patients showed antigen-specific responses to the G1. In contrast, stimulation with HC gp-39 and collagen II showed no significant IFN{gamma} and TNF{alpha} secretion of MNC in all groups. Several G1-derived T-cell epitopes were identified as immunodominant in PB MNC of AS and RA patients and were partly overlapping.

Conclusions. These data show that a cellular immune response to G1 is present in most AS and RA patients. G1-immunodominant epitopes were identified. The relevance of this finding for the pathogenesis of AS and RA remains to be established.

Key words: Ankylosing spondylitis, Rheumatoid arthritis, G1 immunity, T-cell epitope, Aggrecan.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Broere, L. Wieten, E. I. Klein Koerkamp, J. A. G. van Roon, T. Guichelaar, F. P. J. G. Lafeber, and W. van Eden
Oral or Nasal Antigen Induces Regulatory T Cells That Suppress Arthritis and Proliferation of Arthritogenic T Cells in Joint Draining Lymph Nodes
J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 899 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
J Zou, H Appel, M Rudwaleit, A Thiel, and J Sieper
Analysis of the CD8+ T cell response to the G1 domain of aggrecan in ankylosing spondylitis
Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2005; 64(5): 722 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Kuon, M. Kuhne, D. H. Busch, P. Atagunduz, M. Seipel, P. Wu, L. Morawietz, G. Fernahl, H. Appel, E. H. Weiss, et al.
Identification of Novel Human Aggrecan T Cell Epitopes in HLA-B27 Transgenic Mice Associated with Spondyloarthropathy
J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 4859 - 4866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Braun and J. Sieper
Biological therapies in the spondyloarthritides--the current state
Rheumatology, September 1, 2004; 43(9): 1072 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.