Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on March 10, 2004

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh155
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/8/992    most recent
keh155v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yocum, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yocum, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 British Society for Rheumatology; all rights reserved

Original Papers

Safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term experience

D. E. Yocum 1, D. E. Furst 2, W. G. Bensen 3, F. X. Burch 4, M. A. Borton 5*, L. J. Mengle-Gaw 6, B. D. Schwartz 6, W. Wisememandle 4, Q. A. Mekki 5, and on behalf of the Tacrolimus RA Study Group

1 University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
2 Virginia Mason Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Present address: UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
3 St Joseph Hospital/McMaster University, Toronto, ON, Canada
4 NorthEast San Antonio Rheumatology Associates, San Antonio, TX, USA
5 Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA
6 The Camden Group, St Louis, MO, USA

* Corresponding author. E-mail: mary_ann_borton{at}fujisawa.com.

Received 29 September 2003 ; accepted 14 January 2004

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the long-term safety of tacrolimus 3 mg/day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. Patients with active RA who had discontinued all DMARDs for at least 2 weeks and had at least five tender/painful joints and three swollen joints, and required DMARD treatment in the opinion of the investigator, were enrolled into this open-label long-term safety trial. In addition, patients who had completed at least 3 months of treatment with tacrolimus 2 mg/day, tacrolimus 3 mg/day or placebo in a Phase III double-blind efficacy trial were allowed to roll over into this study. This latter group of patients did not have to fulfil any joint count requirements prior to entry into the long-term safety study, provided that no more than 14 days had elapsed between the end of their participation in the double-blind study and screening for the long-term safety study. All patients enrolled received tacrolimus 3 mg/day in addition to their current regimen of NSAIDs and corticosteroids.

Results. 896 patients received at least one dose of tacrolimus 3 mg. The median duration of treatment was 359 days. 145 patients (16.2%) withdrew from the study for adverse events possibly or probably related to tacrolimus, 33 patients (3.7%) withdrew from the study for adverse events unrelated to tacrolimus and 112 (12.5%) withdrew for lack of efficacy. No adverse event with an incidence >0.7% appeared for the first time after the first 3 months of treatment with 3 mg tacrolimus. 529 patients (59%) experienced an adverse event that was possibly or probably related to tacrolimus; the most common were diarrhoea (14.6%), nausea (10.3%), tremor (9.0%), headache (8.7%), abdominal pain (7.9%), dyspepsia (7.6%), increased creatinine (6.8%) and hypertension (5.4%). Twenty-four patients (2.7%) experienced serious adverse events possibly or probably related to study drug; the most common were pneumonia (0.6%), hyperglycaemia (0.3%), gastroenteritis (0.2%), pancreatitis (0.2%) and diabetes mellitus (0.2%). The mean creatinine level increased from 67±19 µmol/l (0.76±0.22 mg/dl) at baseline to 75±26 µmol/l (0.85±0.30 mg/dl) (P<0.0001) at end of treatment. 351 (40.3%) of the 872 patients for whom creatinine levels were available at both baseline and during treatment had >=30% increase from baseline in serum creatinine during the study, either related or unrelated to tacrolimus, with 73 patients (8.4%) having creatinine levels exceeding the normal range. At end of treatment, 177 patients (20.3%) had a >=30% increase from baseline in creatinine. Serum creatinine remained within the normal range throughout the trial in approximately 90% of patients. At the end of treatment, the ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were 38.4%, 18.6% and 9.0% respectively. Over 26% of patients had at least a 70% improvement in both swollen and painful/tender joints.

Conclusion. This study demonstrates that tacrolimus was safe and well-tolerated and provided clinical benefit over a period of at least 12 months.

Key words: Rheumatoid arthritis, Tacrolimus, DMARD, Immunosuppressant, FK506, Prograf.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. Kawai and K. Yamamoto
Safety of tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in elderly patients
Rheumatology, April 1, 2006; 45(4): 441 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. W. McCarey, H. A. Capell, and R. Madhok
Tacrolimus therapy in rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, August 1, 2004; 43(8): 946 - 948.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.