Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on May 18, 2004

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh237
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/8/1034    most recent
keh237v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, L. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received February 4, 2004
Accepted April 15, 2004

Original Papers

Patients' perceptions of treatment with anti-TNF therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study

N. J. Marshall 1, G. Wilson 1, K. Lapworth 2, L. J. Kay 1*

1 Department of Rheumatology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Deparment of Clinical Effectiveness, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Lesley.Kay{at}nuth.northy.nhs.uk.


   Abstract

Objectives. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy is a highly effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as documented using standard outcome measures in clinical trials. Anecdotal experience suggests health benefits for patients other than those measured in this way. We wished to explore patients’ experience of and views about this treatment and the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Registry (BSR BR) process.

Methods. Separate focus groups for patients treated with infliximab (n = 7) and etanercept (n = 12) were undertaken. They were taped and transcribed verbatim, analysed and subjected to peer review and themes were identified.

Results. Five main themes were identified: expectations of treatment, experience of treatment and its effects, concerns about taking a new class of drug, views about the BSR Biologics Registry process and costs.

Conclusions. Patients’ experience of anti-TNF therapy was good, particularly in terms of physical function and well-being, although it did not live up to the very high expectations of some patients. The BSR BR process caused initial apprehension but patients had personal and altruistic reasons for being happy to comply with monitoring requirements. Qualitative methods add to our understanding of the effects of anti-TNF therapy for people with RA.

KEY WORDS: Anti-TNF therapy, Rheumatoid arthritis, Patients’ experience, Focus groups, Registry, Qualitative research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. Scarpato, M. Antivalle, E. G. Favalli, F. Nacci, S. Frigelli, F. Bartoli, L. Bazzichi, G. Minisola, M. Matucci Cerinic, and RIVIERA co-authors
Patient preferences in the choice of anti-TNF therapies in rheumatoid arthritis. Results from a questionnaire survey (RIVIERA study)
Rheumatology, November 17, 2009; (2009) kep354v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. J. Kay, I. D. Griffiths, and for the BSR Biologics Register Management committe
UK consultant rheumatologists' access to biological agents and views on the BSR Biologics Register
Rheumatology, November 1, 2006; 45(11): 1376 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.