Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on June 15, 2004

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh262
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/9/1142    most recent
keh262v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groarke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gsel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groarke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gsel, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received December 1, 2003
Accepted May 12, 2004

Original Papers

The role of perceived and actual disease status in adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis

A. Groarke 1*, R. Curtis 1, R. Coughlan 2, A. Gsel 2

1 Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Ireland
2 Department of Rheumatology, University College Hospital, Galway, Ireland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: annmarie.groarke{at}nuigalway.ie.


   Abstract

Objectives. To examine the role and relative impact of illness perceptions, coping strategies and clinical disease indicators on adjustment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Method. Participants were 75 women with rheumatoid arthritis. The Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), the COPE questionnaire and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS) were administered during a semistructured interview. Disease status was indicated by physician ratings of joint involvement and by the laboratory indices of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP).

Results. Statistically significant correlations (P<0.01) were in the expected direction. Various aspects of adjustment (good physical function, low pain and depression) were associated with perceptions of low illness identity, high control/cure, more serious illness consequences and long illness timeline. Low disease activity was related to good physical function. Depression was associated with high use of coping by denial and with less frequent use of five COPE strategies: active coping, planning, seeking instrumental social support, positive reinterpretation and growth, and acceptance. In hierarchical regression analysis, disease status explained variance in physical function (15%). Illness perceptions accounted for variance in all three adjustment outcomes, ranging from 22 to 27%. Coping variables did not add to the explanation of variance on adjustment.

Conclusions. Illness perceptions have significant implications for adaptation to illness and they outweigh the impact of medical disease status on depression, physical function and pain. Health interventions based on understanding and modifying perceptions of illness may prove useful in facilitating patient well-being.

Keywords: Illness perceptions; Coping; Disease activity; Adjustment; Rheumatoid arthritis
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
P. Verschueren, G. Esselens, and R. Westhovens
Daily practice effectiveness of a step-down treatment in comparison with a tight step-up for early rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, January 1, 2008; 47(1): 59 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. Sheehy, E. Murphy, and M. Barry
Depression in rheumatoid arthritis--underscoring the problem
Rheumatology, November 1, 2006; 45(11): 1325 - 1327.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.