Rheumatology Advance Access published online on June 15, 2004
Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh262
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2004; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Ireland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: annmarie.groarke{at}nuigalway.ie.
Objectives. To examine the role and relative impact of illness perceptions, coping strategies and clinical disease indicators on adjustment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Method. Participants were 75 women with rheumatoid arthritis. The Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), the COPE questionnaire and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS) were administered during a semistructured interview. Disease status was indicated by physician ratings of joint involvement and by the laboratory indices of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Results. Statistically significant correlations (P<0.01) were in the expected direction. Various aspects of adjustment (good physical function, low pain and depression) were associated with perceptions of low illness identity, high control/cure, more serious illness consequences and long illness timeline. Low disease activity was related to good physical function. Depression was associated with high use of coping by denial and with less frequent use of five COPE strategies: active coping, planning, seeking instrumental social support, positive reinterpretation and growth, and acceptance. In hierarchical regression analysis, disease status explained variance in physical function (15%). Illness perceptions accounted for variance in all three adjustment outcomes, ranging from 22 to 27%. Coping variables did not add to the explanation of variance on adjustment. Conclusions. Illness perceptions have significant implications for adaptation to illness and they outweigh the impact of medical disease status on depression, physical function and pain. Health interventions based on understanding and modifying perceptions of illness may prove useful in facilitating patient well-being.
Accepted May 12, 2004
Original Papers
The role of perceived and actual disease status in adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis
2 Department of Rheumatology, University College Hospital, Galway, Ireland
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Verschueren, G. Esselens, and R. Westhovens Daily practice effectiveness of a step-down treatment in comparison with a tight step-up for early rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology, January 1, 2008; 47(1): 59 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Sheehy, E. Murphy, and M. Barry Depression in rheumatoid arthritis--underscoring the problem Rheumatology, November 1, 2006; 45(11): 1325 - 1327. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
