Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on August 10, 2004

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh360
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/11/1409    most recent
keh360v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sautner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Leeb, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sautner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Leeb, B. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received December 25, 2003
Accepted July 9, 2004

Original Papers

Development of the M-SACRAH, a modified, shortened version of SACRAH (Score for the Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatoid Affections of the Hands)

J. Sautner 1*, I. Andel 1, B. Rintelen 1, B. F. Leeb 1

1 Second Department of Medicine, Humanis Klinikum, Lower Austrian Centre for Rheumatology, Stockerau, Austria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: leeb.khstockerau{at}aon.at.


   Abstract

Objectives. The Score for the Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatoid Affections of the Hands (SACRAH) is a self-administered questionnaire assessing functional status, stiffness and pain in patients suffering from hand osteoarthritis (HOA) as well as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the hand. It consists of 23 questions in three domains, to be answered on 100 mm visual analogue scales (VAS). Our goal was to shorten the original SACRAH by elimination of redundant questions in order to make it easier to use for patients and physicians.

Methods. Following an arbitrary procedure employing high intervariable correlations, redundant questions were eventually eliminated. To validate the shortened version, 60 patients with HOA, recruited at four rheumatological centres in Austria, completed the original SACRAH as well as the shortened version. Fifty-five patients suffering from RA of the hands treated at the Second Department of Medicine, Humanis Klinikum Stockerau, also completed both questionnaires.

Results. A total of 11 questions (nine from the function domain and two from the pain domain) were eliminated, leading to the modified score consisting of 12 questions. Comparing the results of SACRAH and M-SACRAH, as well as the domain scores in individual patients, correlation coefficients were r = 0.978 for HOA patients (P<0.0001) and r = 0.986 for RA patients (P<0.0001).

Conclusion. M-SACRAH, the shortened and simplified version of the original SACRAH questionnaire, proved to be as reliable and as representative as SACRAH for hand status in individual HOA and RA patients.

Keywords: Hand function; Osteoarthritis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Simplified scoring questionnaire.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
W Zhang, M Doherty, B F Leeb, L Alekseeva, N K Arden, J W Bijlsma, F Dincer, K Dziedzic, H J Hauselmann, P Kaklamanis, et al.
EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis: report of a task force of ESCISIT
Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2009; 68(1): 8 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
T. Stamm, S. Geyh, A. Cieza, K. Machold, B. Kollerits, M. Kloppenburg, J. Smolen, and G. Stucki
Measuring functioning in patients with hand osteoarthritis--content comparison of questionnaires based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
Rheumatology, December 1, 2006; 45(12): 1534 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.