Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on September 20, 2004
Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh411
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/1/100    most recent
keh411v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felson, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by LaValley, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felson, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by LaValley, M. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received April 23, 2004
Accepted August 20, 2004

Original Papers

Osteophytes and progression of knee osteoarthritis

D. T. Felson 1*, D. R. Gale 2, M. Elon Gale 2, J. Niu 3, D. J. Hunter 3, J. Goggins 3, and M. P. LaValley 3

1 Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston, MA, USA; The Arthritis Center at Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
2 VA Boston Health Care System, Boston, MA, USA
3 Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dfelson{at}bu.edu.


  Abstract

Objectives. Osteophytes are thought to stabilize an osteoarthritic joint, thereby preventing structural progression. Meagre longitudinal data suggest, however, that they are associated with an increased risk of structural progression. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of osteophyte size on radiographic progression in osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods. Using data from a natural history study of persons with symptomatic knee OA, we obtained fluoroscopically positioned postero-anterior (PA) radiographs at baseline, 15 and 30 months. Using an atlas, osteophyte size was scored on a scale of 0-3 at each of four sites on the PA film and, for each knee, both compartment-specific (i.e. medial; lateral) and overall osteophyte scores were computed. Progression was defined as an increase over follow-up in medial or lateral joint space narrowing, based on a semiquantitative grading. Mechanical alignment was assessed using long limb films at the 15 month examination. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relation of osteophyte size with progression, adjusting for age, gender and body mass index, and with and without adjustment for alignment.

Results. Of 270 subjects who had 470 eligible knees with follow-up, 104 (22%) knees showed progression. Overall, osteophyte score modestly increased the risk of progression [odds ratio (OR) per s.d. increase of osteophyte score = 1.4 (95% CI 1.1, 1.8, P = 0.02)], but this effect weakened and became non-significant after adjustment for limb alignment (OR = 1.3). Compartment osteophyte score was strongly associated with malalignment to the side of the osteophyte (e.g. medial osteophyte and varus). Compartment-specific osteophyte score markedly increased the risk of ipsilateral progression (e.g. medial osteophytes -> medial progression) [OR per s.d. = 1.9 (95% CI 1.5, 2.5, P<0.001)] and decreased the risk of contralateral progression [OR per s.d. = 0.6 (95% CI 0.5, 0.8, P = 0.002)], but these associations diminished when we adjusted for limb alignment (OR = 1.5 and 0.7 respectively).

Conclusions. Large osteophytes do not affect the risk of structural progression. They are strongly associated with malalignment to the side of the osteophyte, and any relation they have with progression is partly explained by the association of malalignment with progression.

Keywords: Knee osteoarthritis; Osteophyte; Natural history; Biomechanics; Alignment.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.