Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on November 30, 2004
Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh484
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/3/360    most recent
keh484v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leeb, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Rintelen, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leeb, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Rintelen, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received July 21, 2004
Accepted October 15, 2004

Concise report

The patient's perspective and rheumatoid arthritis disease activity indexes

B. F. Leeb 1*, I. Andel 1, S. Leder 1, B. A. Leeb 1, and B. Rintelen 1

1 Second Department of Medicine, Humanisklinikum Lower Austria, Lower Austrian Center for Rheumatology, Stockerau, Austria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
B. F. Leeb, E-mail: leeb.khstockerau{at}aon.at


  Abstract

Background. Monitoring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by composite indexes is regarded as obligatory when following the recent recommendations for therapy. Whether these recommendations and the patient's perspective are in congruence is a crucial question with respect to the patient's compliance. The aim of the study was to obtain information on the patient's perspective with respect to the disease activity indexes used most often.

Methods. Two hundred and seven RA patients (157 female, 50 male; mean age 59.03 yr, 17-86 yr) were enrolled in this cross-sectional evaluation. The patients' satisfaction [PATSAT (Austrian school mark system) 1 = excellent to 5 = unsatisfactory] and the patients' attitude to therapy (PATATT 1 = reduction, 2 = no change, 3 = increase) were assessed and related to the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M-HAQ). Statistical evaluation was carried out by applying the Mann-Whitney U test, calculating {chi}2 and ANOVA.

Results. According to the DAS28 and the M-HAQ, patients were at a moderately active disease stage and had low functional deficiency. PATSAT was significantly correlated to the disease activity indexes (all PS ≤ 0.002). The mean DAS28 (2.56) at PATSAT 1 was within the remission range, whereas at PATSAT 5 a mean of 5.52 indicated highly active disease. PATATT was found to be related to PATSAT, but did not completely parallel it. Reduction of therapy was intended at a mean DAS28 of 2.87, whereas a request for an increase did not occur before a mean DAS28 of 4.92.

Conclusion. The patients' therapeutic attitudes are somewhat in line with their satisfaction, which mirrors disease activity to a great extent, though not with the common therapeutic recommendations. The DAS28 proved to be superior to both other indexes taking account of the patient's perspective. These results may provide guidance in patient care and education as well as therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis; Disease activity measurement; Patient's perspective.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
B. RINTELEN, P. M. HAINDL, J. SAUTNER, B. A. LEEB, C. DEUTSCH, and B. F. LEEB
The Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index-5 in Daily Use. Proposal for Disease Activity Categories
J Rheumatol, May 1, 2009; 36(5): 918 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.