Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on November 30, 2004

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh498
Rheumatology © British Society for Rheumatology 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/3/382    most recent
keh498v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maloney, S.
Right arrow Articles by Green, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maloney, S.
Right arrow Articles by Green, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received August 18, 2004
Accepted October 29, 2004

Original Papers

Accessibility, nature and quality of health information on the Internet: a survey on osteoarthritis

S. Maloney 1, D. Ilic 1*, and S. Green 1

1 Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
D. Ilic, E-mail: dragan.ilic{at}med.monash.edu.au


   Abstract

Objectives. This study aims to determine the quality and validity of information available on the Internet about osteoarthritis and to investigate the best way of sourcing this information.

Methods. Keywords relevant to osteoarthritis were searched across 15 search engines representing medical, general and meta-search engines. Search engine efficiency was defined as the percentage of unique and relevant websites from all websites returned by each search engine. The quality of relevant information was appraised using the DISCERN tool and the concordance of the information offered by the website with the available evidence about osteoarthritis determined.

Results. A total of 3443 websites were retrieved, of which 344 were identified as unique and providing information relevant to osteoarthritis. The overall quality of website information was poor. There was no significant difference between types of search engine in sourcing relevant information; however, the information retrieved from medical search engines was of a higher quality. Fewer than a third of the websites identified as offering relevant information cited evidence to support their recommendations.

Conclusions. Although the overall quality of website information about osteoarthritis was poor, medical search engines may provide consumers with the opportunity to source high-quality health information on the Internet. In the era of evidence-based medicine, one of the main obstacles to the Internet reaching its potential as a medical resource is the failure of websites to incorporate and attribute evidence-based information.

Keywords: Osteoarthritis; Quality of information; Internet; e-Health; Patient education.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
J. N. STINSON, L. TUCKER, A. HUBER, H. HARRIS, C. LIN, L. COHEN, N. GILL, J. LUKAS-BRETZLER, L. PROULX, and D. PROWTEN
Surfing for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Perspectives on Quality and Content of Information on the Internet
J Rheumatol, August 1, 2009; 36(8): 1755 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family NursingHome page
C. K. Campbell-Grossman, D. B. Hudson, R. Keating-Lefler, and S. Heusinkvelt
New Mothers Network: The Provision of Social Support to Single, Low-Income, African American Mothers Via E-Mail Messages
Journal of Family Nursing, May 1, 2009; 15(2): 220 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.