Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on February 3, 2005

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh549
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/5/577    most recent
keh549v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haywood, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haywood, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, P. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Society for Rheumatology; all rights reserved
Received September 14, 2004
Accepted December 24, 2004

Original Papers

Patient-assessed health in ankylosing spondylitis: a structured review

K. L. Haywood 1*, A. M. Garratt 2, and P. T. Dawes 3

1 Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
3 Norwegian Centre for Health Services Research, St Olav's Plass, Oslo, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
K. L. Haywood, E-mail: kirstie.haywood{at}uhce.ox.ac.uk


   Abstract

Objective. To review evidence relating to the measurement properties for all disease-specific, multi-item, patient-assessed health instruments in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods. Systematic literature searches were made to identify instruments, using predefined criteria relating to reliability, validity, responsiveness and precision.

Results. Twelve AS-specific and three arthritis-specific instruments met the inclusion criteria. Three AS-specific instruments that measure health-related quality of life (HRQL) were reviewed. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and the Dougados Functional Index (DFI) had the greatest amount of evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness across a range of settings. Four instruments lacked evidence for test-retest or internal consistency reliability. Most were assessed for validity through comparisons with other instruments, global judgements of health, mobility or clinical and sociodemographic variables. Most were assessed for responsiveness through mean score changes. Three instruments lacked evidence of responsiveness.

Conclusion. This review provides a contribution to AS assessment. AS-specific multi-item measures specific to the assessment of pain, stiffness, fatigue and global health were not identified; where assessed, these domains were largely measured with single-item visual analogue scales. Single items may provide a limited reflection of these important domains. The BASFI and DFI remain the instruments of choice for functional assessment. HRQL is recommended as a core assessment domain. Further concurrent evaluation is recommended.

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; Patient-assessed health; Measuring properties.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Braun, N. McHugh, A. Singh, J. S. Wajdula, and R. Sato
Improvement in patient-reported outcomes for patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with etanercept 50 mg once-weekly and 25 mg twice-weekly
Rheumatology, June 1, 2007; 46(6): 999 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Martindale, J. Smith, C. J. Sutton, D. Grennan, L. Goodacre, and J. A. Goodacre
Disease and psychological status in ankylosing spondylitis
Rheumatology, October 1, 2006; 45(10): 1288 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.