Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on April 6, 2005

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh624
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/7/902    most recent
keh624v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isenberg, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isenberg, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received September 8, 2004
Accepted February 25, 2005

Original Papers

BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group's disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

D. A. Isenberg 1*, A. Rahman 1, E. Allen 1, V. Farewell 2, M. Akil 3, I. N. Bruce 4, D. D'Cruz 5, B. Griffiths 6, M. Khamashta 5, P. Maddison 7, N. McHugh 8, M. Snaith 9, L. S. Teh 10, C. S. Yee 11, A. Zoma 12, and C. Gordon 11

1 University College London, London, UK
2 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
3 Sheffield Centre for Rheumatic Disease, Sheffield, UK
4 University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
5 St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
6 The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
7 University of Wales, Bangor, UK
8 Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK
9 Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Debshire, UK
10 Blackburn Royal Infirmary, Blackburn, UK
11 University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
12 Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, Scotland, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
D. A. Isenberg, E-mail: d.isenberg{at}ucl.ac.uk


   Abstract

Objective. To devise a more discriminating version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) disease activity index and to show that it is reliable.

Methods. A nominal consensus approach was undertaken by members of BILAG to update and improve the BILAG lupus disease activity index. The index has been revised following intense consultations over a 1-yr period. It has been assessed in two real-patient exercises. These involved patients with diverse clinical features of SLE, including gastrointestinal, hepatic and ophthalmic problems, which the earlier versions of the index did not fully take into account. Reliability in terms of the ability to differentiate patients was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. The level of agreement between physicians was determined by calculating the ratio of estimates of the standard error (SE) attributable to the physicians to the SE attributable to the patients.

Results. Good reliability and high levels of physician agreement were observed in one or both exercises in the constitutional, mucocutaneous, neurological, cardiorespiratory, renal, ophthalmic and haematological systems. In contrast, the musculoskeletal system did not score as well, although providing more clear-cut glossary definitions should greatly improve the situation.

Conclusions. Some significant changes in the BILAG disease activity index to assess patients with SLE are proposed. The process of demonstrating validity and reliability has started with these two exercises assessing real patients. Further validation studies are under way. BILAG 2004 is likely to be valuable in clinical trials assessing new therapies for the treatment of SLE, as it provides a more comprehensive system-based disease activity measure than has been available previously.

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus; Disease activity; Assessment; Index; BILAG.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C.-S. Yee, V. Farewell, D. A. Isenberg, B. Griffiths, L.-S. Teh, I. N. Bruce, Y. Ahmad, A. Rahman, A. Prabu, M. Akil, et al.
The BILAG-2004 index is sensitive to change for assessment of SLE disease activity
Rheumatology, June 1, 2009; 48(6): 691 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
A Podolskaya, M Stadermann, C Pilkington, S D Marks, and K Tullus
B cell depletion therapy for 19 patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 401 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
A. Sinclair, G. Appel, M.A. Dooley, E. Ginzler, D. Isenberg, D. Jayne, D. Wofsy, and N. Solomons
Mycophenolate mofetil as induction and maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis: rationale and protocol for the randomized, controlled Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS)
Lupus, December 1, 2007; 16(12): 972 - 980.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. R. Sivaraj, O. M. Durrani, A. K. Denniston, P. I. Murray, and C. Gordon
Ocular manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus
Rheumatology, December 1, 2007; 46(12): 1757 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. Petri and R. Brodsky
High-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Stem Cell Transplantation for Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
JAMA, February 1, 2006; 295(5): 559 - 560.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.