Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on August 9, 2005

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kei046
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/12/1525    most recent
kei046v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sieper, J.
Right arrow Articles by Braun, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sieper, J.
Right arrow Articles by Braun, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received May 31, 2005
Accepted July 12, 2005

Original Papers

Persistent reduction of spinal inflammation as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 2 yrs of treatment with the anti-tumour necrosis factor agent infliximab

J. Sieper 1, X. Baraliakos 2, J. Listing 3, J. Brandt 4, H. Haibel 5, M. Rudwaleit 5, and J. Braun 4*

1 The first two authors have contributed equally to this work; Department of Rheumatology, Charité Medical School, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
2 The first two authors have contributed equally to this work; Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Berlin, Germany
3 German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany
4 Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Berlin, Germany
5 Department of Rheumatology, Charité Medical School, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Braun, E-mail: J.Braun{at}Rheumazentrum-Ruhrgebiet.de


   Abstract

Objectives. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) benefit from anti-TNF therapy both on a clinical basis and as depicted by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is not known whether spinal inflammation remains suppressed over time. Our objective was to assess spinal inflammation by MRI in AS patients after 2 yr of continuous infliximab treatment.

Methods. Twenty patients with active AS were examined by MRI at baseline, after 3 months (end of placebo-controlled-phase) and after 2 yr of continuous infliximab therapy (5 mg/kg/6 weeks). T1 pre- and post-gadolinium (T1/gadolinium-diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid) and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) MRI sequences were performed and read by one blinded reader using the ASspiMRI score.

Results. Spinal inflammation, detected by MRI in all patients at baseline, decreased after 3 months only in the infliximab group in both MRI sequences. Persistent improvement of spinal inflammation was seen after 2 yr by scoring STIR sequences, with a mean score of 4.6 ± 5.9 vs 15.2 ± 13.2 at baseline (P = 0.01). On an individual level, inflammatory spinal lesions decreased from 6.7 ± 5.0 per patient at baseline to 2.2 ± 1.8 after 2 yr (P = 0.003). Improvement in spinal inflammation was found in all patients by both MRI sequences. Only a minor degree but some spinal inflammation was still present after 2 yrs.

Conclusion. Spinal inflammation in MRI was persistently reduced in all patients constantly treated with infliximab, but it was not completely eradicated. Disease activity parameters did not directly correlate with MRI, but both pointed in the same direction. Both types of information may be useful for the definition of response to anti-TNF therapy.

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; Infliximab; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spinal inflammation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Braun and J. Sieper
What is the most important outcome parameter in ankylosing spondylitis?
Rheumatology, December 1, 2008; 47(12): 1738 - 1740.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
X. Baraliakos, J. Listing, J. Brandt, H. Haibel, M. Rudwaleit, J. Sieper, and J. Braun
Radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 4 yrs of treatment with the anti-TNF-{alpha} antibody infliximab
Rheumatology, September 1, 2007; 46(9): 1450 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. N. Jois, K. Gaffney, and A. Keat
Anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy for ankylosing spondylitis--unresolved issues
Rheumatology, June 1, 2007; 46(6): 899 - 901.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
K. Nistala, J. Babar, K. Johnson, P. Campbell-Stokes, K. Foster, C. Ryder, and J. E. McDonagh
Clinical assessment and core outcome variables are poor predictors of hip arthritis diagnosed by MRI in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Rheumatology, April 1, 2007; 46(4): 699 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. N. Jois, J. Leeder, A. Gibb, K. Gaffney, A. Macgregor, M. Somerville, and D. G. I. Scott
Low-dose infliximab treatment for ankylosing spondylitis--clinically- and cost-effective
Rheumatology, December 1, 2006; 45(12): 1566 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
M M Ward
Outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis: what makes the assessment of treatment effects in ankylosing spondylitis different?
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2006; 65(suppl_3): iii25 - iii28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.