Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on November 8, 2005

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kei079
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/1/53    most recent
kei079v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey-Goldman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey-Goldman, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received July 7, 2005
Accepted July 14, 2005

Original Papers

Disease damage and low bone mineral density: an analysis of women with systemic lupus erythematosus ever and never receiving corticosteroids

C. Lee 1*, O. Almagor 2, D. D. Dunlop 2, S. Manzi 3, S. Spies 4, A. B. Chadha 1, and R. Ramsey-Goldman 1

1 Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
2 Institute for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
3 Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
4 Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
C. Lee, E-mail: c-lee17{at}northwestern.edu


   Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the relationship between disease damage and bone mineral density (BMD) in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 307 women with SLE. Patients attended a single clinic visit that included an interview, physical examination, laboratory testing and BMD measurements (hip and/or lumbar spine). Women were stratified by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology cumulative disease damage index (SDI) ≥1 (Damage) vs SDI=0 (No Damage), and prior use of corticosteroids (CS), yielding four groups: (1) Damage/CS+ (n=138), (2) Damage/CS- (n=23), (3) no Damage/CS- (n=100), and (4) no Damage/CS- (n=46).

Results. Mean age at SLE diagnosis was 32.7 ± 11.8 yr, 24.4% were African American, 65.0% were premenopausal, and mean SDI ± s.d. was 1.3 ± 1.8. In the unadjusted and adjusted models controlling for significant univariate risk factors for osteoporosis, the reference group (Group 1) had significantly lower mean BMD T-scores at the hip and lumbar spine than groups having no disease damage (Groups 3 and 4) independent of CS use status. Similar hip and lumbar spine mean BMD T-scores were observed in women with disease damage with and without CS exposure (Groups 1 and 2).

Conclusions. Women with SLE having disease damage and no CS use had BMD T-scores at the hip and lumbar spine similar to those of women with disease damage and prior CS use. These findings suggest an association between disease damage and lower BMD T-scores in women with SLE.

Keywords: SLE; Bone mineral density; Osteoporosis; Disease damage; Corticosteroids.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
K. Almehed, H. Forsblad d'Elia, G. Kvist, C. Ohlsson, and H. Carlsten
Prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in female SLE patients--extended report
Rheumatology, July 1, 2007; 46(7): 1185 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.