Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on June 12, 2006

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel088
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/9/1062    most recent
kel088v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vyse, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vyse, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received December 22, 2005
Accepted February 3, 2006

6th European Lupus Review

Mice, humans and haplotypes--the hunt for disease genes in SLE

R. J. Rigby 1, M. M. A. Fernando 1, and T. J. Vyse 1 *

1 Rheumatology Section, Imperial College, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
T. J. Vyse, E-mail: t.vyse{at}imperial.ac.uk


   Abstract

Defining the polymorphisms that contribute to the development of complex genetic disease traits is a challenging, although increasingly tractable problem. Historically, the technical difficulties in conducting association studies across the entire human genome are such that murine models have been used to generate candidate genes for analysis in human complex diseases, such as SLE. In this article we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this approach and specifically address some assumptions made in the transition from studying one species to another, using lupus as an example. These issues include differences in genetic structure and genetic organisation which are a reflection on the population history. Clearly there are major differences in the histories of the human population and inbred laboratory strains of mice. Both human and murine genomes do exhibit structure at the genetic level. That is to say, they comprise haplotypes which are genomic regions that carry runs of polymorphisms that are not independently inherited. Haplotypes therefore reduce the number of combinations of the polymorphisms in the DNA in that region and facilitate the identification of disease susceptibility genes in both mice and humans. There are now novel means of generating candidate genes in SLE using mutagenesis (with ENU) in mice and identifying mice that generate antinuclear autoimmunity. In addition, murine models still provide a valuable means of exploring the functional consequences of genetic variation. However, advances in technology are such that human geneticists can now screen large fractions of the human genome for disease associations using microchip technologies that provide information on upwards of 100,000 different polymorphisms. These approaches are aimed at identifying haplotypes that carry disease susceptibility mutations and rely less on the generation of candidate genes.

Keywords: Genetic polymorphism; Association Haplotype; SLE.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. J. Amaral, H.-J. Megens, R. P. M. A. Crooijmans, H. C. M. Heuven, and M. A. M. Groenen
Linkage Disequilibrium Decay and Haplotype Block Structure in the Pig
Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 569 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.