Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on July 26, 2006

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel217
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/2/285    most recent
kel217v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Conaghan, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Conaghan, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received September 19, 2005
Accepted May 19, 2006

Original Papers

Clinical effectiveness and dose response of image-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection for hip osteoarthritis

P. Robinson 1 *, A.-M. Keenan 2, and P. G. Conaghan 2

1 Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Radiology, Leeds, UK
2 University of Leeds, Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
P. Robinson, E-mail: p.robinson{at}leedsth.nhs.uk


   Abstract

Objectives. To assess symptomatic change after intra-articular corticosteroid (IAST) injection at 2 doses in hip osteoarthritis (OA), and to examine dose response and predictors of response.

Methods. Patients with hip OA (90 women and 30 men and median age 64 yrs) referred for IAST fluoroscopic injection were included in this longitudinal, clinical trial. WOMAC scores, body mass index (BMI), conventional radiographic grade (Kellgren and Lawrence scoring) and ultrasound measures (including capsular thickness and osteophyte assessments) were recorded at baseline. In the first phase of the study, 75 patients were injected with 40 mg methylprednisolone; another 45 patients were injected with 80 mg in the second phase. Change in WOMAC scores from baseline to weeks 6 and 12 were calculated for each dose and then dose comparisons were made. Clinical responders (>15% reduction in baseline pain score) were identified in order to establish predictors of response.

Results. For the 40 mg dose, there was a statistically significant improvement in pain (P < 0.001) and stiffness (P < 0.001) but not disability at week 6, and only the improvement in stiffness at week 12 was maintained (P = 0.041). For the 80 mg dose, there was significant improvement in pain (P < 0.001), stiffness (P < 0.001) and disability (P < 0.001) at week 6, which was maintained for all domains at week 12 (P = 0.002; P = 0.001; P < 0.001). When the doses were compared, the 80 mg dose demonstrated a significant improvement compared with the 40 mg group for stiffness at week 12 (P = 0.026) and disability at both weeks 6 and 12 (P = 0.026; P = 0.004). Imaging findings did not relate to severity of symptoms or response to IAST.

Conclusions. In these two hip OA cohorts, both the 40 mg and 80 mg IAST doses had a beneficial effect at week 6, while the 80 mg dose maintained this improvement at week 12. Comparison of the two dose groups provided some evidence of a dose response. Randomized controlled trials of IAST for hip OA are now required.

Keywords: Osteoarthritis; Hip; Corticosteroid; Radiography; Ultrasound.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
I. Atchia, F. Birrell, and D. Kane
A modular, flexible training strategy to achieve competence in diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound in patients with hip osteoarthritis
Rheumatology, October 1, 2007; 46(10): 1583 - 1586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.