Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on July 28, 2006
Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel228
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/2/292    most recent
kel228v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zarrouk, V.
Right arrow Articles by Fantin, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zarrouk, V.
Right arrow Articles by Fantin, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received March 22, 2006
Accepted May 23, 2006

Concise Report

Imaging does not predict the clinical outcome of bacterial vertebral osteomyelitis

V. Zarrouk 1, A. Feydy 2, F. Sallès 1, V. Dufour 1, P. Guigui 3, A. Redondo 4, and B. Fantin 1 *

1 Department of Internal Medicine, AP-HP, Beaujon hospital, 92100 Clichy and University Paris VII Denis Diderot, Faculté de Médicine, France
2 Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Beaujon hospital, 92100 Clichy and University Paris VII Denis Diderot, Faculté de Médicine, France
3 Department of Orthopedics, AP-HP, Beaujon hospital, 92100 Clichy and University Paris VII Denis Diderot, Faculté de Médicine, France
4 Department of Neurosurgery, AP-HP, Beaujon hospital, 92100 Clichy and University Paris VII Denis Diderot, Faculté de Médicine, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
B. Fantin, E-mail: bruno.fantin{at}bjn.aphp.fr


  Abstract

Objectives. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are useful for initial assessment of bacterial spondylodiscitis. However, clinical relevance of imaging changes during treatment is less well-documented.

Methods. Between October 1997 and March 2005, 29 patients with documented bacterial spondylodiscitis were prospectively enrolled. They had clinical, biological and imaging examinations (MRI and/or CT) at M0 and M3, and in 22 cases, at M6.

Results. Mean age was 58 yrs. Antimicrobial chemotherapy lasted an average of 98 days. The median follow-up was 18 months, including 12 months after the completion of treatment. Infection was cured in every patient. Biological markers of inflammation returned to normal at M3. Six patients had painful and/or neurological sequelae.

Decreased disc height was a consistent and early sign, and remained stable during the follow-up. Vertebral oedema, present in 100% of cases initially, persisted in 67 and 15% of cases at M3 and M6, respectively. Discal abscesses and paravertebral abscesses, present in 65 and 39% of cases initially, persisted in, respectively, 42 and 9% of cases at M3 and in 18 and 3% of cases at M6. Epidural abscesses were present at diagnosis in 30% of cases, and had always disappeared by M3. Imaging abnormalities found at M0 and M3 did not differ between patients with and without late neurological or painful sequelae.

Conclusions. Imaging abnormalities often persist in patients with bacterial spondylodiscitis despite a favourable clinical and biological response to antibiotic treatment. They are not associated with relapses, neurological sequelae or persistent pain. Imaging controls are not necessary when bacterial spondylodiscitis responds favourably to treatment.

Keywords: Pyogenic spondylodiscitis; Vertebral osteomyelitis; Imaging; CT scanner; MRI.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.