Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on September 14, 2006

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel320
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/3/508    most recent
kel320v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryall, C.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryall, C.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, K. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received April 27, 2006
Accepted August 3, 2006

Original Article

A prospective cohort study of arm pain in primary care and physiotherapy--prognostic determinants

C. Ryall 1, D. Coggon 1, R. Peveler 2, J. Poole 1, and K. T. Palmer 1 *

1 MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
2 Department of Mental Health, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
K. T. Palmer, E-mail: ktp{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk


   Abstract

Objective. To investigate outcome and prognostic determinants for arm pain presenting to primary care and physiotherapy services.

Methods. Patients with arm pain were recruited as they presented to primary care and physiotherapy services, and were followed for 12 months. At baseline, they were classified by diagnosis using a validated examination schedule. Depression, somatizing tendency, health anxiety, fear-avoidance beliefs and chronic pain outside the arm were ascertained using standard definitions. Three outcomes were considered: same-site pain during the final month of follow-up (continuing pain); pain present on most days of that month; and pain present without a break of 7 days over follow-up (‘unremitting’ pain). Associations were explored in multi-level logistic regression models and summarized as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results. Altogether, 313 (83%) of 375 subjects completed follow-up, including 53% with ‘continuing’ and 24% with ‘unremitting’ pain. ‘Continuing’ pain was predicted most strongly by male sex (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.2) (this association was restricted largely to the elbow), higher frequency of pain in the past month at baseline (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.6), chronic pain at sites outside the arm (ORs 1.6-2.4 for different sites) and current smoking (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6-6.6). There were also indications that mental health and fear-avoidance beliefs influenced prognosis. Predictors for the other two adverse outcomes were similar.

Conclusion. Arm pain often persists in patients who consult medical services. Predictors of persistence include male sex (elbow only), frequency of pain at baseline, chronic pain at other sites and smoking.

Keywords: Upper limb pain; Natural history; Epidemiology; Prognosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
I. Madan, I. Reading, K. T Palmer, and D. Coggon
Cultural differences in musculoskeletal symptoms and disability
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2008; 37(5): 1181 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.