Rheumatology Advance Access published online on October 25, 2006
Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel360
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Tai Po Hosptial, Hong Kong SAR
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of urine protein-to-creatinine (P/C) ratio in an untimed urine specimen as compared with 24 h total protein excretion for measurement of proteinuria in patients with lupus nephritis. Methods. Proteinuria in patients with lupus nephritis was assessed by 24 h total protein excretion and spot urine P/C ratio. Correlation and limits of agreement between the two methods were evaluated. The discriminant cutoff values for spot urine P/C ratio in predicting 24 h protein threshold excretion of Results. A total of 165 samples were available for assessment with 21.8% excluded due to inadequate collection. A strong correlation (r = 0.91, P < 0.0001) was found between spot urine P/C ratio and 24 h urine protein excretion. Bland-Altman plot showed the two tests had acceptable limits of agreement in low level of protein excretion (-0.86 to +0.92 g/day when protein excretion was <2.0 g/day). The limits became wider as the protein excretion increased. The spot urine P/C ratios of 0.45 (sensitivity 0.92; specificity 0.88), 0.7 (0.92; 0.89) and 1.84 (1.0; 0.86) mg/mg reliably predicted 24 h urine total protein equivalent thresholds at Conclusion. This study supports the recommendation of using spot urine P/C ratio in screening and monitoring proteinuria in patients with lupus nephritis. However, in assessing the exact amount of proteinuria, the urine P/C ratio may have unacceptably wide limits of agreement in high protein excretion range.
Received August 23, 2006
Accepted September 19, 2006
Original Papers
Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio in an untimed urine collection is a reliable measure of proteinuria in lupus nephritis
Y. Y. Leung 1 *, C. C. Szeto 2, L. S. Tam 2, C. W. K. Lam 3, E. K. Li 2, K. C. Wong 2, S. W. Yu 2, and E. W. Kun 1
2 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Hong Kong SAR
3 Department of Chemical Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
Y. Y. Leung, E-mail: katyccc{at}hotmail.com
![]()
Abstract
0.3,
0.5,
1.0 and
3.5 g/day were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves.
0.5, 1.0 and 3.5 g/day.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?