Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on July 17, 2007

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem172
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/9/1460    most recent
kem172v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayerhoefer, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Aigner, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayerhoefer, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Aigner, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Short-term outcome of painful bone marrow oedema of the knee following oral treatment with iloprost or tramadol: results of an exploratory phase II study of 41 patients

M. E. Mayerhoefer1, J. Kramer2, M. J. Breitenseher1,3, C. Norden4, A. Vakil-Adli5, S. Hofmann6, R. Meizer7, H. Siedentop4, F. Landsiedl7 and N. Aigner7

1Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 2Institute of CT and MRI Diagnostics Schillerpark, Linz, 3Institute of Radiology, Waldviertelklinikum Horn, Horn, Austria, 4Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Specialized Therapeutics, Berlin, Germany, 5Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity Linz, Linz, Austria, 6Department of Orthopaedics, LKH Stolzalpe, Stolzalpe and 7First Orthopaedic Department, Orthopaedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria

Correspondence to: Marius E. Mayerhoefer, Department of Radiology, Vienna General Hospital (AKH), Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: marius.mayerhoefer{at}meduniwien.ac.at


   Abstract

Objectives. To compare the therapeutic effects of oral iloprost and tramadol on the outcome of bone marrow oedema (BME) of the knee by MR imaging and clinical assessment.

Methods. Forty-one patients with painful ischemic or mechanical BME of the knee were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Patients were randomized either to iloprost (n = 21, group 1) or tramadol (n = 20, group 2). The treatment duration was 4 weeks. The Larson knee score was used to assess function before treatment and then 3 days, 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks and 3 months after the start of treatment. Short tau inversion recovery and T1-weighted MR images of the affected knees were obtained before and 3 months after the start of treatment. Bone marrow oedema was assessed visually and by computer-assisted quantification for baseline and follow-up MR examinations.

Results. Thirty-three patients completed the study as scheduled. The mean Larson score improved from 58.6 points to 81.8 points in group 1, and from 59.6 points to 86.8 points in group 2, after 3 months (no significant difference between the treatment groups). On MR images, complete BME regression in at least one bone was observed in nine patients (52.9%) in group 1, as opposed to three patients (18.7%) in group 2, after 3 months (P = 0.034). Correspondingly, the median BME volume decreased by 58.0% in group 1, and by 47.5% in group 2.

Conclusions. The analgesic effect of iloprost and tramadol was similar. BME regression on MR images was more pronounced under iloprost treatment.

KEY WORDS: Knee, Bone marrow cells, MRI, Drug therapy

Submitted 17 January 2007; revised version accepted 30 May 2007.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.