Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on April 9, 2008

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/6/872    most recent
ken059v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cantini, F.
Right arrow Articles by Salvarani, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cantini, F.
Right arrow Articles by Salvarani, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Frequency and duration of clinical remission in patients with peripheral psoriatic arthritis requiring second-line drugs

F. Cantini1, L. Niccoli1, C. Nannini1, E. Cassarà1, P. Pasquetti1, I. Olivieri2 and C. Salvarani3

12nd Division of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Hospital of Prato, 2Rheumatology Department of Lucania, S. Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera and 3Division of Rheumatology, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Correspondence to: F. Cantini, 2nd Department of Medicine-Rheumatology Unit, Hospital of Prato, Piazza Ospedale,1 – 59100, Prato, Italy. E-mail: fcantini{at}usl4.toscana.it; cantini.fabrizio{at}virgilio.it


   Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the frequency and duration of clinical remission in patients with PsA.

Methods. All consecutive new outpatients with peripheral PsA requiring second-line drugs and RA observed between January 2000 and December 2005 were included in a prospective, case-control study. Primary end point was to assess the frequency of remission in peripheral PsA compared with RA. Secondary end points were to compare the duration of clinical remission during treatment and after therapy interruption, ACR 20, 50, 70 response rates and to detect any remission predictor at diagnosis. Treatment regimen was standardized in both groups. From January 2003 to December 2005, therapy was suspended in PsA patients and controls if achieving remission.

Results. One or more episodes of remission occurred in 57/236 (24.1%) PsA patients and in 20/268 (7.5%) controls (P < 0.001). The mean duration of remission was of 13 ± 9.4 months in PsA patients and 4 ± 3.7 in controls (P > 0.001). Remission episodes were more frequent in PsA patients treated with anti-TNF compared with those receiving traditional DMARDs (P > 0.001), with no differences regarding the duration. After therapy interruption, the remission duration was 12 ± 2.4 months in PsA and 3 ± 1.5 in RA (P < 0.001). No remission predictor at diagnosis resulted by multivariate analysis.

Conclusion. Remission is possible in up to 24% of patients with peripheral PsA. It is significantly more frequent, but not longer, in patients receiving anti-TNF drugs compared with those treated with traditional DMARDs. Patients remain in remission for a long period after therapy interruption, thus suggesting an intermittent therapeutic strategy.

KEY WORDS: PsA, Clinical remission, Remission criteria, DMARDs, Anti-TNF drugs, MTX, RA

Submitted 15 November 2007; revised version accepted 24 January 2008.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Journal of Rheumatology SupplementHome page
N. J. McHUGH
Traditional Schemes for Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis
J Rheumatol Suppl, August 1, 2009; 83(0): 49 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.